Im being tested, by men who want to taste that, lick that, squeeze that, stick tongues, fingers and u know what into that. Coming looking for action soldiers with pump guns all cockd up. Sure i can hump that, ride that bump and grind that, flex that, squeeze that til it pops...But did u ever think that i might be looking 4sum one to stroke that, cuddle that, get down on both knees and kiss that, dive deep in and build a home in that? This isnt about war and man hate, its about getting that forever mate to give me my one and last Ooh oh my....
by Thuthu Ndlela on Facebook
The idea and image in this poem that strikes me most is that of home. The poet mentions her need for someone to build a home in "that" after performing tender ministrations to "that", demonstrating adoration to "that" by getting "down on both knees [to] kiss “that”, showing total commitment in [diving in] "deep..and [building ] a home in that".
This poem by Thuthu is particularly striking for a number of reasons. One of them is its relationship to the development suggested by some of her earlier status updates on Facebook by Thuthu. Status updates suggest something of the thinking of the writer since they are the writer’s attempt to sum up in one line what they are thinking of or doing at any a particular point in time. In comparison with Thuthu’s status updates before this poem, this poem suggests a deeper sensitivity to the paradoxes involved in the erotic than the status updates had shown before now.
Another reason why the poem is striking is its vivid evocation of the various permutations of sex, expressed in terms of the language of a person who is very familiar with those possibilities. Beyond the evocation of the lascivious and its delights is the understanding that when all is said and done, when the fires have been lit and sated, something more lasting, more fulfilling, is needed. That something is expressed in terms of the idea of home. The depiction of "that", the much desired destination represented by a particular capacity of the poet, in terms of a possible abode, and not just a temporary one but one that gives all the comfort and security and satisfactions of home properly understood, is very powerful. It evokes an ageless desire of the human being as it emerges from amorous relationships.
The evocation of a desire for homemaking also, incidentally and ironically, without intending to do so, evokes the difficult compatibility between the erotic and the domestic. The erotic, as in this instance, often inspires the desire for permanence of relationship, for security of affiliation, for mutuality of comfort and security in sharing. These very values, however, are often problematic home fellows with the erotic. Sustaining the erotic in the midst of the familiarity that comes with the security embodied by domesticity is one of the great challenges of domesticity, a challenge compounded by the fact that domesticity is vital for the physical and psychological sustenance of the children who come to life through the expression of the erotic. The erotic often competes with the energy and time required to sustain the material structure of the home and the inhabitants of that home.
The paradoxical relationship between the erotic and the domestic underlies conceptions of various kinds of binding relationship, from monogamy to polygamy and cuncubinage, to the culture of mistresses. This paradox might also be responsible for the fact that most stories of amour and eros,as far as I know, are not set in the bonds of matrimony, but in the activity leading up to it, in the illicit drama existing alongside it, and in the vicissitudes that do not succeed in achieving consummation through the blessing and sanction of the altar or the registry. The amorous and the erotic do exist plentifully within the framework of the agreements that constitute the marital bond, but they seem to be different in tone, in intensity, in the effort required to keep ablaze what was once more a matter of the unfettered animal spirits evoked by Wordsworth. The greater subtlety that comes with deepening mutual psychological integration, the spatial, social and interpersonal navigation involved in building a hearth where the amorous and the erotic can thrive in the midst of a house with children, in the face of the expectations of society, in response to the unflattering light shown on the loved other by the disillusionment of proximity, make the domestic setting an unfavourable context for most amorous and erotic literature.
This poem, in relation to some of the poet’s earlier comments on similar subjects as suggested by her status updates on Facebook, also suggests the paradoxical relationship between the erotic and time as represented by the development of the human being. Erotic energy does not necessarily indicate erotic knowledge and skill, erotic knowledge and skill do not necessarily represent an appreciation of the larger emotional and interpersonal contexts of the erotic; the presence of all these factors do not necessarily suggest the presence of opportunity, the presence of opportunity does not necessarily imply the availability of adequate, much less ideal prospects for the exercise of the erotic and its amorous possibilities.
by Thuthu Ndlela on Facebook
The idea and image in this poem that strikes me most is that of home. The poet mentions her need for someone to build a home in "that" after performing tender ministrations to "that", demonstrating adoration to "that" by getting "down on both knees [to] kiss “that”, showing total commitment in [diving in] "deep..and [building ] a home in that".
This poem by Thuthu is particularly striking for a number of reasons. One of them is its relationship to the development suggested by some of her earlier status updates on Facebook by Thuthu. Status updates suggest something of the thinking of the writer since they are the writer’s attempt to sum up in one line what they are thinking of or doing at any a particular point in time. In comparison with Thuthu’s status updates before this poem, this poem suggests a deeper sensitivity to the paradoxes involved in the erotic than the status updates had shown before now.
Another reason why the poem is striking is its vivid evocation of the various permutations of sex, expressed in terms of the language of a person who is very familiar with those possibilities. Beyond the evocation of the lascivious and its delights is the understanding that when all is said and done, when the fires have been lit and sated, something more lasting, more fulfilling, is needed. That something is expressed in terms of the idea of home. The depiction of "that", the much desired destination represented by a particular capacity of the poet, in terms of a possible abode, and not just a temporary one but one that gives all the comfort and security and satisfactions of home properly understood, is very powerful. It evokes an ageless desire of the human being as it emerges from amorous relationships.
The evocation of a desire for homemaking also, incidentally and ironically, without intending to do so, evokes the difficult compatibility between the erotic and the domestic. The erotic, as in this instance, often inspires the desire for permanence of relationship, for security of affiliation, for mutuality of comfort and security in sharing. These very values, however, are often problematic home fellows with the erotic. Sustaining the erotic in the midst of the familiarity that comes with the security embodied by domesticity is one of the great challenges of domesticity, a challenge compounded by the fact that domesticity is vital for the physical and psychological sustenance of the children who come to life through the expression of the erotic. The erotic often competes with the energy and time required to sustain the material structure of the home and the inhabitants of that home.
The paradoxical relationship between the erotic and the domestic underlies conceptions of various kinds of binding relationship, from monogamy to polygamy and cuncubinage, to the culture of mistresses. This paradox might also be responsible for the fact that most stories of amour and eros,as far as I know, are not set in the bonds of matrimony, but in the activity leading up to it, in the illicit drama existing alongside it, and in the vicissitudes that do not succeed in achieving consummation through the blessing and sanction of the altar or the registry. The amorous and the erotic do exist plentifully within the framework of the agreements that constitute the marital bond, but they seem to be different in tone, in intensity, in the effort required to keep ablaze what was once more a matter of the unfettered animal spirits evoked by Wordsworth. The greater subtlety that comes with deepening mutual psychological integration, the spatial, social and interpersonal navigation involved in building a hearth where the amorous and the erotic can thrive in the midst of a house with children, in the face of the expectations of society, in response to the unflattering light shown on the loved other by the disillusionment of proximity, make the domestic setting an unfavourable context for most amorous and erotic literature.
This poem, in relation to some of the poet’s earlier comments on similar subjects as suggested by her status updates on Facebook, also suggests the paradoxical relationship between the erotic and time as represented by the development of the human being. Erotic energy does not necessarily indicate erotic knowledge and skill, erotic knowledge and skill do not necessarily represent an appreciation of the larger emotional and interpersonal contexts of the erotic; the presence of all these factors do not necessarily suggest the presence of opportunity, the presence of opportunity does not necessarily imply the availability of adequate, much less ideal prospects for the exercise of the erotic and its amorous possibilities.
