Friday, November 05, 2010

THE FLY I KILLED

I have a rule that I dont kill flies.

I  dont kill flies because I dont see myself as having the right to terminate the life of any creature unless it is absolutely  necessary. If I can help it,why should I put an end to that  wondrous organism,pulsing with life,a force I do not comprehend and which no human being,no matter how knowledgeable, can create? 

For that reason most of the time I do not eat meat or fish. When I am particularly hungry I have been known to forgive myself for breaking that rule but I  do try to keep it and I succeed most of the time. I also realize that my eating eggs is a breach of my rule but I am working on that one.

Animals desire to live, like humans also desire life. Like humans they also have families which they  often love and care for. Yet certain creatures on the third  planet from the sun have convinced themselves that they have a right to feed on their neighbors who are weaker than they are.

In  a science fiction story the Martians who take over the earth and live on the planetary surface, while keeping humans exiled  underground, breed  humans as food.

Another reason why I try not to eat fish or meat which I hardly mention when giving explanations because people are likely to have difficulty understanding it: I aspire  one day to be able to move in the forest with the fearlessness  of a person who knows he will suffer no harm because he shares an identity of being with all the elements that make up the forest.

Why should I aspire to what might look like a strange ambition? Is the forest a proper place for human beings? Is it not for animals  and plants?

Sorry. The forest can be  a very good home away from home for humans.It is not easy for me to describe the absolute serenity of a forest,particularly a forest not  built by humans and demonstrating the atmospheric density of virgin nature. Such an environment could lead you to look again at the fever that human beings choose to describe as life,as one English poet put it. I am working on making a summative  statement of my experiences with the forest.

The other day I killed a fly and have had cause to regret it.

I regret it because  even though I was able to achieve the peace I wanted by killing the fly  I now realize that the goal for which I killed the fly was only partially realized.I  think taking the fly's life was not worth it.

 The fly had  kept buzzing  around the room when I  was struggling to concentrate on some new and most tantalizing  ideas buzzing in my head.

This happened some weeks ago.It occurred to me yesterday,however,that after killing  the fly,I had peace around me. Quiet and calm but the ideas did not buzz  in my head anymore.

Had I disrupted the flow of inspiration by taking time off to kill the bothersome creature? 

Had I killed an embodiment of my friend Esu,the Yoruba/Orisa deity,one of whose incarnations, Esu Queso is associated with cockroaches,rats and maggots,who share feeding habits similar to those of flies?

My contemplation of Esu as mediated through his symbols,my efforts to converse with him,my invocation of him using magical techniques,my public celebration of what I understand as my relationship with him,my offering him a sacrifice at the crossroads outside my window in the English village where I live, have gone hand in hand with a consistent flow of inspiration,of steadily ripening ideas,including the flow of ideas represented by this essay which I suddenly felt compelled to write in the midst of a restless encounter with ideas while writing another essay about Esu.

What does this contribute to understanding  of the reality of inspiration?

I am working on understanding that.

It certainly works for me and I will keep it up.

On the issue  of the fly, I have begged  Esu to forgive me. I have asked for another chance. You never know about these things. If the creator of the cosmos could be described as visiting the earth in the form of a carpenter's son  from Galilee,why not as a fly? It too is a wondrous construction,intricate and pulsing with the holy fire,holding together perfectly articulated wings,legs,head,fantastically detailed eyes and other perfectly synchronized and operational physical features.It certainly has a mind and uses it because it knows how to dodge me when I am chasing it.Is this ability to evade my intentions purely instinctual? I doubt it.

One of my favorite quotes  ever is from the sublime work of Indian philosophy and Hinduism, the Bhagavad Gita. It is  this  declaration from Krishna,described as the embodiment  of the creator of the cosmos: "Having permeated the universe with a fragment of myself,I remain".

A Hindu holy man once chastised a beggar for placing his feet on a stone object revered as a symbol of the god Shiva. The beggar placed his feet on the ground only to have the same symbol spring up instantly on the same spot. The beggar  then asked "Where will I place my feet where the Lord is not?" The holy man bowed,realizing he was in the presence of the transcendent  one,far yet near,sustainer of cosmos from the beginning to the end and resumption of time,Shiva the cosmic  dancer. This story resonates with another declaration,which if I remember well,comes from  Krishna in the Gita: "If you pray to the stone, there I am".

Next time I will do my best to make the fly depart peacefully through the window rather than kill it no matter how long it takes to persuade it to do so.

It had actually occurred to me just after terminating the little one's store of the mysterious fire that animates all living things,including myself,that here I was,snuffing out a quality that is unique in the cosmos just because I wanted some quiet. The incommensurate exercise of power in that would have been chilling if not that one has grown up to see animals and insects as dispensable lesser creatures, an  attitude one is working to grow out of.

It was when I was looking at another fly that it occurred to me that the inspirational buzzing of ideas in my head  that led me to kill the fly to enable me  listen better to those ideas could be likened to the buzzing of the fly.The  buzzing in my mind made me restless and yet attentive all at once.

Or am I  engaging in the self validating thinking of believers in the irrational, a style of thinking which is at times inspirational?

JACK DONGARRA, A JUDGE OF THE 1989 GORDON BELL PRIZE,AND PROFESSOR OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING AT THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE,ON THE SCOPE OF ACHIEVEMENT OF PHILIP EMEAGWALI,1989 GORDON BELL PRIZE WINNER


1. fromJack Dongarra <dongarra@eecs.utk.edu>
totoyin adepoju <toyin.adepoju@googlemail.com>
date4 November 2010 11:13
subjectRe: ENQUIRY ON PHILIP EMEAGWALI,WINNER OF THE 1989 GORDON BELL PRIZE
mailed-byeecs.utk.edu


This was over 22 years ago and I really don't remember. I would disagree with much of what you have written.
He had nothing to do with the development of the CM-2.
He had nothing to do with the development of the internet.
I know of no contribution that Emeagali has made in computational science.
His work on the Bell Prize has had no impact.
Hope this is clear.
Jack Dongarra

**********************************************************
Prof. Jack Dongarra; Innovative Computing Laboratory; EECS Department;
1122 Volunteer Blvd; University of Tennessee; Knoxville TN 37996-3450;

2. 

fromJack Dongarra <dongarra@eecs.utk.edu>
totoyin adepoju <toyin.adepoju@googlemail.com>
date4 November 2010 14:59
subjectRe: ENQUIRY ON PHILIP EMEAGWALI,WINNER OF THE 1989 GORDON BELL PRIZE
mailed-byeecs.utk.edu


Just add to each of these "To my knowledge".
Jack Dongarra

**********************************************************
Prof. Jack Dongarra; Innovative Computing Laboratory; EECS Department;
1122 Volunteer Blvd; University of Tennessee; Knoxville TN 37996-3450;


3.Questions to which the mail from Professor Jack Dongarra is responding to:

fromtoyin adepoju <toyin.adepoju@googlemail.com>
todongarra@cs.utk.edu
date20 October 2010 15:27
subjectENQUIRY ON PHILIP EMEAGWALI,WINNER OF THE 1989 GORDON BELL PRIZE
mailed-bygooglemail.com
  

Dear Professor Dongara,

Good afternoon.

I hope this meets you well.

This email is an enquiry relating to Philip Emeagwali, one of the Winners of the Gordon  Bell Prize of 1989 of which you were one of the  judges.

There has been significant confusion in various publications as to the scope of the achievements of Philip Emeagwali,particularly in terms of the character of his achievement that won him the Gordon Bell Prize, leading various people and bodies to seek clarification.As far as I know,your views as a scientist and a judge of that prize are yet to be sought on this subject

It would be most helpful if you could  clarify the following issues dealing with the facts  of this matter:


1.The copy of a report on the prize described as written by you and the other judges( found on the Wikipedia article on Emeawagwali and attached to this mail) described Emeagwali as using the Connection Machine or CM-2 in the work that won him the prize.It is claimed in other publications that he programmed this computer remotely.Do you know if this is correct?

2.Are you aware if  he played any role in the development of the CM-2 or of supercomputing generally?

3.Are you aware of any effect his work with the CM-2 has  made to the development of the Internet?

4.Are you aware of any contributions made by Emeagwali's work to the  oil and information technology industries?


It would also be helpful if you could express an opinion on the following question which is less one of  fact but of  judgement on the subject:

It is puzzling that in spite of Emeagwali's achievement in winning the Gordon Bell Prize,there is hardly any  reference to his work  in scientific  or industry literature.Could you suggest any opinion as to why that is the case?


Thank you very much

Toyin Adepoju,
PhD candidate,Comparative Literature Programme,University College,London.

ALAN H. KARP, A JUDGE OF THE 1989 GORDON BELL PRIZE,AND HEWLETT-PACKARD PRINCIPAL SCIENTIST,ON THE SCOPE OF ACHIEVEMENT OF PHILIP EMEAGWALI,1989 GORDON BELL PRIZE WINNER

omKarp, Alan H >
totoyin adepoju <toyin.adepoju@googlemail.com>
date21 October 2010 00:12
subjectRE: ENQUIRY ON PHILIP EMEAGWALI,WINNER OF THE 1989 GORDON BELL PRIZE
mailed-byhp.com
 
Thanks for explaining the purpose of your questions.  My answers are inline below.

________________________
Alan Karp
Principal Scientist
Virus Safe Computing Initiative
Hewlett-Packard Laboratories
1501 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304
(650) 857-3967, fax (650) 857-7029

From: toyin adepoju [mailto:toyin.adepoju@googlemail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 7:35 AM
To: Karp, Alan
Subject: ENQUIRY ON PHILIP EMEAGWALI,WINNER OF THE 1989 GORDON BELL PRIZE

Dear Alan Karp,

Good afternoon.

I hope this meets you well.

This email is an enquiry relating to Philip Emeagwali, one of the Winners of the Gordon  Bell Prize of 1989 of which you were one of the  judges.

There has been significant confusion in various publications as to the scope of the achievements of Philip Emeagwali,particularly in terms of the character of his achievement that won him the Gordon Bell Prize, leading various people and bodies to seek clarification.As far as I know,your views as a scientist and a judge of that prize are yet to be sought on this subject

It would be most helpful if you could  clarify the following issues dealing with the facts  of this matter:


1.The copy of a report on the prize described as written by you and the other judges( found on the Wikipedia article onEmeawagwali and attached to this mail) described Emeagwali as using the Connection Machine or CM-2 in the work that won him the prize.It is claimed in other publications that he programmed this computer remotely.Do you know if this is correct?

Not specifically, but remote use of supercomputers, while harder than it would be today, was not all that rare at that time.

2.Are you aware if  he played any role in the development of the CM-2 or of supercomputing generally?

No.

3.Are you aware of any effect his work with the CM-2 has  made to the development of the Internet?

No.

4.Are you aware of any contributions made by Emeagwali's work to the  oil and information technology industries?

No, although it wouldn’t surprise me if the algorithm he used in his Gordon Bell Prize work was adopted by the industry.


It would also be helpful if you could express an opinion on the following question which is less one of  fact but of  judgement on the subject:

It is puzzling that in spite of Emeagwali's achievement in winning the Gordon Bell Prize,there is hardly any  reference to his work  in scientific  or industry literature.Could you suggest any opinion as to why that is the case?

The Gordon Bell Prize rewards superior performance or price/performance.  Being cited by others in some area is a reflection of the importance to the field.  These two metrics are orthogonal, so it’s not surprising when a problem submitted for the Gordon Bell Prize is not considered important by application experts. 

Emeagwali’s Gordon Bell Prize submission was quite impressive, especially in comparison to other submissions presenting work of teams of computer scientists and application specialists.  It would not have surprised me to see him continue his career in reservoir modeling, numerical methods, or computer architecture.  To the best of my knowledge, he never published work in any of these areas.  It’s hard to be cited without refereed publications.


Thank you very much

Toyin Adepoju,
PhD candidate,Comparative Literature Programme,University College,London.

Thursday, November 04, 2010

THE DELE GIWA ASSASSINATION AND THE "COMMANDER IN CHIEF"

When the Nigerian journalist Dele Giwa was assassinated more than a decade ago through a letter bomb,one of his members of staff,Kayode Soyinka (?) who was with him when he received the letter,if I remember well, stated that Giwa said the letter was from the Commander in Chief.

Who is the  Commander in Chief in a political  system like Nigeria was at the time? The President of the country,who at that time was General Ibrahim Babangida.

Shortly before Giwa received that letter,one of the aides of the President had called on Giwa by phone.It was either Halilu Akilu or Tunde Togun.One of those men was  also later quoted as referring to Giwa's case after the assassination in terms of a person performing the suciodal action of placing themselves in the path of  a moving vehicle,or something along those lines.

The civil rights lawyer Gani Fawehimi tried strenuously to bring Akilu and Togun to trial on this case, without success.Babangida was later  invited to the reconciliation  committee set up by the Obasanjo government to explain himself in relation to this and other issues but as far as I know he never honoured the invitation.

No headway has been made on the Giwa case.I dont think  anybody was charged  for that assassination.

It has turned out exactly as predicted by the shocked students I was talking with at the University of Benin when we heard the news. It was agreed that nobody would be prosecuted for the murder because a person who could commit such a brazen act against such a  famous journalist must have the connections in government to make sure that no investigation would be made.

Meanwhile,Akilu and Togun walk free.Babangida has become known as the "ultimate godfather" and is even campaigning to contest in the next Presidential election  in Nigeria.

I can still visualise the picture of the shattered lower half of Giwa's body,the flesh burnt like butchered meat.I understand he appealed to his friend, the doctor who treated him, "Dont let me die".

Any suggested  corrections about facts in this account are welcome.

Monday, November 01, 2010

Projected Developments in Immersive Technology: From Creating Physical Spaces to Creating Assoiated Ideational Spaces FROM CREATING PHYSICAL SPACES TO CREATING ASSOCIATED IDEATIONAL SPACES

Research goal:

This is a brief statement of projected developments in immersive technology.
Immersive technology is technology that enables the user to immerse themselves in a virtual world.In such immersion,the boundaries between the person's actual physical location and the world projected through computer programming are significantly  blurred,enabling the person  to experience the virtual world almost in three dimensions.I am yet to experience a virtual system sophisticated enough to deliver impressions to other senses apart from sight.

The person using  the system navigates the virtual landscape,walking long roads and choosing what destinations they wish to go to.

I am interested in the possibility of creating immersive systems that enable the navigation of landscapes as well as the communication of ideas in relation to those landscapes. I am curious about using this system in exploring relationships between the values native to landscape if any and the values human beings ascribe to them.


Targets


1.To explore  a virtual reproduction of landscape

Existing technology: immersive systems such as the CAVE


2.To simultaneously experience various possibilities of ideational interpretation of this landscape

Projected technology: programming immersive systems to communicate not only images but  also ideas.

How:Basic method
:through visual symbols that suggest these ideas.


Inspiration:

Susanne Wenger, environmental artist who correlates landscape with the expression of archetypal energies,forms which in themselves constitute expressions of the possibilities of human awareness,

The  Ifa divinatory system
, developed by the Yoruba of Southern Nigeria as a means of mapping interpretive possibilities,in which the framework represented by the geomantic forms of the system constitute diverse but interrelated interpretive pathways.

Archeologist Christopher Tilley on the strategies of spatial navigation realized by the English megalithic builders.